Warc, 1 August 2014
LONDON: International rivals like Procter & Gamble and
Colgate-Palmolive are not the greatest threat to Unilever, but instead the main
competition comes from local brands in emerging markets, the FMCG firm's CEO
has said.
In an interview with the Financial Times, Paul Polman said
"regional players" in emerging markets have become the company's
toughest competition, but he remained confident that Unilever has long-term
opportunities in these markets.
For example, emerging markets will account for 80% of the
world's population and new leaders in India and Indonesia have demonstrated the
need for structural reform, which he said would help to accelerate growth.
Similarly, the Chinese government's drive for the country to
become less dependent on exports will work to Unilever's advantage, he said,
because "a company like ours is best served by inward consumption than by
exports". So, "there is no cause for concern," he asserted.
Polman was speaking a week after Unilever reported its
half-year results. While pre-tax profits rose 15% to €4.2bn in the six months
to the end of June, boosted by disposals, analysts were disappointed that sales
fell 5.5% to €24.1bn.
In order to boost sales, there has been speculation that the
company would seek a major acquisition, such as Colgate-Palmolive, but Polman
played down such talk.
"We always look at possibilities," he said.
"Many people are focused on what they know of companies in the developed
world, but there are many new companies that are coming along," he said.
Unilever currently derives 57% of its sales from emerging
markets and Polman's strategy is to pursue organic growth in these regions to
take the proportion to 75% while also launching premium and innovative products
in developed markets.
Under his stewardship, the company has been selling off some
slow-growth products from its food portfolio, such as Ragu sauce, but he
cautioned against an assumption that this would extend to other categories,
such as margarines and spreads.
He said: "Even if you don't like a business – and I'm
not saying we don't – can someone else run it better than you? Otherwise, if
you sell it and you don't get enough for it, it would not be the right
thing."
Data sourced from Financial Times; additional content by
Warc
No comments:
Post a Comment