Warc, 1 July 2014
LONDON: Google, Microsoft and Walt Disney have emerged as
the strongest company brands in a new study that examines the difference
between consumer perception and financial performance of the world's top 100 companies
by market capitalisation.
FutureBrand, the global brand consultancy, surveyed 3,030
members of the "informed public" (defined as consumers who are
currently or were previously working in professional jobs) in 17 countries,
asking them about their perceptions of the world's top 100 companies, as ranked
by PwC.
Walt Disney was a significant gainer under this process.
Ranked 40th in terms of financial worth, a positive perception in terms of
'purpose' and 'experience' attributes propelled it to third place in the
resulting FutureBrand Index.
A smaller "cap gap" was also registered for the
top two: Google, first in the FutureBrand Index, sat third in the market
capitalisation ranking, and Microsoft, second in the FutureBrand ranking was
fourth by market cap. FutureBrand noted that Microsoft had scored highest on
the attributes of thought leadership and innovation, and speculated that this
may be due to the impact of a new CEO.
In all technology businesses occupied six of the top ten
places, the others being Apple (4th), Samsung (5th), Intel (6th) and IBM
(10th). The remaining three were automaker Toyota (7th), and two FMCG business
in Johnson & Johnson (8th) and Unilever (9th).
In general, consumer services, tech, FMCG and entertainment
companies held or improved positions between the PwC and FutureBrand indexes
whilst oil and gas, banking and tobacco companies fell.
"Companies are also brands and our results show for the
first time the extent to which the strongest in 2014 are able to transcend the
positions dictated by opinions of their financial worth; opinions which in any
case are formed largely by financial institutions," said Tom Adams, global
head of strategy at FutureBrand.
He highlighted those businesses which had built a strong
company brand "to confound expectations of a negative cap gap". These
included non-direct-to-consumer brands, such as Intel (6th, up 43), Unilever
(9th, up 43) and Inditex (25th, up 62), brands operating in a sector that do
not prioritise brand spending, such as SABIC (13th, up 72), or brands suffering
by association with a sector with a poor image, such as EcoPetrol (38th, up
57).
Data sourced from FutureBrand; additional content by Warc
staff
No comments:
Post a Comment