Search This Blog

Wednesday, 4 December 2013

Research proposal: impact of private equity on SMEs

The use of private equity provides a lifeline for business during recessions where other forms of equity and debt financing prove to be scarce. This paper seeks evaluate the impact of equity on small businesses during recessions and makes use of a case study of Porsche to demonstrate these impacts. The paper also gives an analysis of previous scholarly writings on private equity and its impact on businesses in order to create understanding of the topic in question. The study also outlines the research methodology that shall be used in achieving the set objectives as well as the data analysis and presentations to be used in presentation of the final report

Porsche Automobile Holding SE was formed as a holding company in 2007 and it controls 50.1% of Porsche Zwischenholding GmbH which in turn controls 50.7% of Volkswagen AG and 100% Porsche AG (Porsche SE, 2011). The subsidiaries mainly specialize in production of quality automobiles as well as the production of auto parts.  Porsche Automobile Holding SE is based in Stuttgart. The symbol SE refers to Societas Europaea which means that the company was transformed into a European Company (Porsche SE, 2011). This transformation was conducted to enhance its efficiency in implementing its growth programs. The transformation also facilitated the establishment of a supervisory board that would ensure sufficient monitoring of the management teams. Like other businesses, Porsche is affected by the macroeconomic environmental that may inhibit or enhance their business performance. These factors may from time to time require that additional finances be raised in order to adjust in a manner that sustains competitiveness and ensures survival. The most common forms of financing include private equity and debt financing. This paper shall focus on private equity and shall evaluate its impact on small businesses during a recession. To illustrate these impacts, the paper shall use the case study of Porsche Automobile Holding SE.  

The research title shall read as follows: The Impact of Private Equity on small family businesses during recession: a case study of Porsche Automobile Holding SE.

In determining the impact of private equity on small businesses during recession, the study shall seek to create understanding on the challenges faced by businesses during recessions and opportunities thereof that necessitate the sourcing of financing. The study shall also expound on the characteristics of private equity with the aim of enhancing insight into possible impacts that it can have on the businesses. The research shall then focus on the case study analysis of Porsche Automobile Holding SE with the aim of demonstrating the impact of private equity on small businesses. The study shall therefore seek to answer the following questions:
·         What is private equity and what applications does it have in businesses
·         What impact does private equity have on firms across the industry
·         How has private equity impacted on the structure, performance and general aspects of Porsche Automobile Holding SE

Literature Review
Private equity involves capital raised from private sources of individual assets. These may include their savings, or proceeds from personal assets owned by these individuals (Cuny and Talmor, 2007). Private equity is mainly used in expansion of operations, acquisitions, takeovers and other strategic business moves such as product innovation to suit changing market needs (Private Equity Growth Capital Council, 2011). The use of private equity in financing business expansion and new ventures has been cited as the most viable option for businesses operating in economies undergoing a recession. The poor performance of the stock markets makes it difficult for businesses to source for funds from the public. Similarly, the level of uncertainty in the markets makes the banks and other financial institutions to be hesitant in offering debt financing (Berger, Klapper, and Udell, 2001). This uncertainty stems from information asymmetry and high agency costs. The businesses are then left only one other viable option of sourcing for finances- private equity. The investors providing this private equity are often better placed than financial institutions to counter the levels uncertainty involved due to their ability to closely monitor the running of the businesses as well as their ability to influence the decision making processes of the management teams through the board of directors (Morgan, 2007). According to some scholars, private equity leads to a generation of higher levels of efficiency in the companies being invested in (Kaplan, 1989). This has in the past been attributed to the perceived value-adding capacities of many private equity investors.

However, critics have opposed this view stating that the good performance is often just as a result of investors identifying organizations that already possess the skills and ability to perform well in the market using their superior intelligence networks that enable them to accurately predict the future movement of industries (Maherault, 2004). According to Jensen and Meckling (1976), the resultant tight control by the investors reduces the agency costs as the managers lose the some measure of autonomy that would normally be abused in a bid to meet their own interests.  The new structures also often result in performance based incentive schemes that motivate managers to improve the efficiency of companies in order to improve on the organizations’ performance levels. The incentive may include cash rewards or company stocks that transform these managers into owners of the companies (Leslie and Oyer, 2009). Another critical aspect of private equity is its impact on employment. Researchers have shown that most of private equity investments are always accompanied by structural changes in the targeted organizations and this does lead to a certain degree of loss of jobs (Barney, 1991). However, research has shown that most of these firms subsequently grow within three or four years raising the employment levels beyond the pre-investment levels (Berger and Udell, 1998). Scholars have also been critical on whether the use of private equity leads to a transfer of wealth from tax payers as a result of higher tax shields generated by the higher leverage levels typical of private equity financing scenarios (Thomas and Masulis, 2009). The question of financial distress levels also come into play as it is a function of the level of leverage in a company and is bound to get affected by the injection of private equity (Whited and Wu, 2006). Researchers have shown that the level of financial distress in companies that have been invested in tends to rise immediately after the investment although the levels of distress generally average at lower than other comparable businesses within a span of three years (Zmijewski, 1984).

The injection of new private equity also acts as a catalyst for the transfer of wealth from the debtors to the business owners. The value of debt decreases with the engagement of the company in ventures that that are riskier than earlier envisaged by the bondholders. The equity investors often advocate for engagement in projects whose success they can reasonably predict. However, these ventures are viewed as risky by other stakeholders due to the asymmetry of information between them and the investors. In the case of acquisitions, the existence of recession allows businesses to acquire strategic organizations at discounted values (Kaplan and Stromberg, 2009). Harsh market conditions often leave firms in compromising situations that could easily lead to their closure. The option of allowing in private equity investors to save the organization in exchange for a substantial level of ownership becomes the best available option. These firms are normally greatly undervalued at the points of these transactions. In the face of scarce credit, firms are forced to turn to private equity investors to ensure survival. The investors may also be corporate organizations that may be operating in the same industry and who may opt to take advantage of the opportunity to consolidate their market base in the economy. The undervaluation that is normally associated with recessions often leaves the target firms vulnerable to major ownership restructuring where the acquiring organizations in many cases acquire the majority shares, leaving the current owners voiceless in a firm they founded (Bargeron, Schlingemann, Stulz, and Zutter, 2008).

This study shall make use of both primary and secondary research. Secondary research shall be concentrated on evaluating general characteristics and impacts of private equity on small business during recession as well as gathering useful data needed for analyzing the case study. The use of primary data shall mainly be focused on the case study where members of the target organization shall be requested to provide information through oral interviews and written questionnaires.

The population will be employees at Porsche. The study shall focus on interviewing five respondents from these employees. The sampling method shall be judgmental. This is due to the fact that the some of the information to be sought after may only be known to just a certain segment of the population (Gray, 2004). The study shall pick targeted respondents from members of senior management who have worked with the company for a period of not less than ten years. This length of experience will enable them shed light on any transformational processes the organization may have gone through with remarkable precision.

The primary data collection shall be through interviews and where necessary, through questionnaires. The questionnaires shall be designed and availed to the respondents prior to the interview. This will enable the respondent to reflect on the tasking aspects of the interview hence ensuring higher chances of obtaining accurate and reliable information. Care shall be taken to ensure that interview schedules conform to the timings and settings of the respondents as much as possible. This will help enhance the level of cooperation and subsequently the quality of information they shall offer. Secondary data shall mainly be obtained from recent journals and industry reports that provide information and evidence relating to the research topic. These shall be synthesized in order to be compatible with the objectives of this study.

The data analysis shall mainly be qualitative. Most of the findings are likely to prove or disprove existing theories on the subject matter. Quantitative analysis shall be used to measure performance levels, efficiency levels, growth of revenues and employment and other aspects necessary to illustrate what impact private equity has on small businesses.

The target respondents are senior management level employees who are by nature extremely busy individuals. This may get in the way of their availability for these interviews. The researcher shall ensure that there is timely communication and shall indicate a level of flexibility to allow the respondent to alter the time and venue of the interview in order to ensure the interview takes place at a time when the respondents are not distracted or in a hurry to get to something else. Insufficient secondary data may also undermine the findings of this study. These insufficiencies where not surmountable shall be noted and shall be incorporated into recommendations for further research.

The research shall require a period of 8 weeks to carry it out. The main resources required will be finances, journals, reliable publications and the Internet

The most common ethical issue raised in research involves protection of the anonymity of the respondents (Kerlinger and Howard, 1999). Unless where expressly allowed, anonymity of the respondents shall be respected. Confidentiality of information also causes great concern to respondents (Neuman, 2006). Any confidential information collected in the course of the data collection shall also be exempt from inclusion in the report. Coercion into offering information by a researcher is also considered grossly unethical (Patten, 2004). The researcher shall also refrain from coercing the respondents into providing information. The right of the respondents to abstain from answering any of the questions in the questionnaire shall be respected.

For more theory and case studies on: http://expertresearchers.blogspot.com/

Bargeron, L.L., Schlingemann, F.P., Stulz, R.M., Zutter, C.J., 2008. Why do private acquirers pay so little compared to public acquirers? Journal of Financial Economics, 89(3), pp. 375-390
Barney, J.B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, pp. 99-120
Berger, A.N., Klapper, L.F., Udell, G.F., 2001, The ability of banks to lend to informational opaque small businesses, Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, pp. 2127–2167
Berger, A.N., Udell, G.F., 1998. The economics of small business finance: the role of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle, Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, pp. 613–674
Cuny, C.J., Talmor, E., 2007. A theory of private equity turnarounds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(4), pp. 629-646
Gray, D.E., 2004. Doing research in the real world. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Jensen, M., Meckling, W., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of financial Economics, 3 (4), pp. 305-360
Kaplan, S., 1989. The effects of management buyouts on operating performance and value. Journal of Financial Economics, 24(2), pp. 217-254
Kaplan, S.N., Stromberg, P., 2009.  Leveraged buyouts and private equity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), pp. 121-146
Kerlinger, F.N., Howard B.L., 1999. Foundations of behavioral research. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Leslie, P., Oyer, P., 2009. Managerial incentives and value creation: Evidence from private equity. EU Working Paper, 2009
Mahérault, L., 2004. Is there Any Specific Equity Route for Small and Medium-Sized Family Businesses? The French Experience, Family Business Review, 17(3), pp. 221-235
Morgan, J., 2007. Private Equity Finance: How it works, what its effects are, can it be justified? (Online) Available at: http://www.helsinki.fi/oik/globalgovernance/glo/publications/morgan/Working_paper_3%5B1%5D.pdf (Accessed 1 April 2011)
Neuman, W.L., 2006. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Patten, M.L., 2004. Understanding research methods: An overview of the essentials. 4th ed. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.
Porsche SE, 2011. Company. (Online) Available at: http://www.porsche-se.com/pho/en/porschese/ (Accessed 1 April 2011)
Private Equity Growth Capital Council, 2011. How Private Equity Works. (Online) Available at: http://www.pegcc.org/just-the-facts/private-equity-handbook/ (Accessed 1 April 2011)
Thomas, R.S., Masulis, R.W., 2009. Does Private Equity Create Wealth? The Effects of Private Equity and Derivatives on Corporate Governance. (Online) Available at: http://lawreview.uchicago.edu/issues/archive/v76/76_1/Masulis.pdf (Accessed 1 April 2011)
Whited, T.M., Wu, G., 2006. Financial constraints risk. Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), pp. 531-559

Zmijewski, M.E., 1984. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, pp. 59-82

No comments:

Post a Comment