Search This Blog

Thursday, 20 February 2014

A Personal Strategic Analysis Project for Jesuit Business School Students

A Personal Strategic Analysis Project for Jesuit Business School Students

Philip W. Glasgo
Department of Finance
Xavier University
3800 Victory Parkway
Cincinnati, OH 45207-5162
(513) 745-3595
glasgo@xavier.edu


A Personal Strategic Analysis Project for Jesuit Business School Students

             About a decade ago the author’s university deleted a strategic management(or Business Policy) class from the required undergraduate curriculum.  This was done at least partly due  to a general unhappiness with students’ performance in the class and a  widely-held  belief that since 21-year olds would probably  not  be making strategic decisions for  many years, the significance of the class  was probably not apparent to them.

            In place of the Strategic Management class, one required course in each discipline was designated as the “Capstone” class for that major and professors teaching it  agreed to include a strategic management component.  As the primary instructor teaching this class in the Finance Department at a Midwestern Jesuit university, the author was  a part of this process.

            Although the author had previously taught the Strategic Management class at the graduate level, it proved quite a challenge to select  material that was relevant for  the undergraduate students and even more of a challenge to maintain student interest in the material.  Initially, students were required to choose a  local company or a nationally or internationally known company and conduct: an analysis of their mission statement; a SWOT analysis; a five-forces analysis; an analysis of their business portfolio using a Boston Consulting Group(BCG) matrix. Additional company-specific assignments were given by the instructor based on his knowledge of specific  issues confronting the company that each student chose.

            While this exercise met the primary goal of introducing key strategic management concepts to the undergraduate students, the results were, frankly, pretty boring for the instructor to read, and not very well-received by the students, according to their comments in the course evaluation and also in exit surveys. 

            As a result of attending the Jesuit Business School Conference at Santa Clara in 2001, the instructor decided to try a different approach.   Once of the participants there, Fr. Greg Konz(then at John Carroll but now at Marquette), mentioned  a Personal Analysis and Strategic Career Analysis assignment  he gave to sophomore and junior management majors.  This assignment was modified into a Strategic Management project for the seniors in the capstone class[Appendix 1]   Students are required to:
  • conduct a self-analysis including strengths and weaknesses similar to a SWOT

  • develop a personal mission statement including personal, professional, and spiritual aspects(as appropriate)

  • develop a simple “business plan” for the next five years of their life incorporating personal, professional, and spiritual goals

They are also invited to, on their own, perform additional analysis as suggested by Fr. Konz’s original assignment,  to investigate specific career options. 

            At first,   students are somewhat reluctant to analyze themselves.  However, once they are assured that the project will be graded based on thoroughness and the quality of  the presentation rather than what they say( a few have “tested” this promise with some pretty bizarre stuff),  most of them seem to enjoy the exercise, and often mention it as a rewarding experience in the course evaluation.

            Those who have never  taken the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator(MBTI)  are encouraged to do it through the University’s Career Planning and Placement Center.  Many of them include “discoveries” they made about themselves by taking  the MBTI  in the self-analysis.

            Occasionally it has seemed appropriate for the instructor to share his experiences with a similar assignment many years ago  in order to assure the students that there is no “correct” answer to the assignment.  In particular,  discussion of a personal tragedy in the author’s extended family that led to a time of questioning the goodness of or even the existence of a God  seems to make the students feel more comfortable discussing their beliefs, lack of belief, or questioning of their spiritual values.

            The first time the assignment was given, several students were perhaps too thorough in discussing  their personal backgrounds.  The instructor is not  a psychologist, psychiatrist, marriage counselor, or  substance abuse counselor, and some of the stories told were probably better kept private, rather than revealed in a paper.  Thus, subsequent classes have been told that if there is something they want to talk about, to include it, but if they would rather not, they are free to say “there is something very personal that I thought about as a result of this assignment but would prefer not to write down”.  This option has been invoked by at least one student almost every semester.

            Several student papers will be  available for inspection(with names removed, of course) at the CJBE conference.   The real purposes of the assignment are  to help the student develop some understanding of Strategic Management concepts while doing some introspection and personal analysis.  Hence,  the instructor’s  critique of the paper is intentionally supportive and positive.   But several common threads exist:
  • a  majority of the papers  fail to recognize any weaknesses beyond superficial things(They are told: “If you don’t think you have any, you just identified one”)

  • “Being Happy”  is usually one of the most important goals

  • a majority of the students are questioning their faith, and the university experience has  clearly fostered this development.  A number of them “feel  guilty” about this

  • ethical issues and “doing the right thing”  are important to the vast majority of the students.  Since ethics was not even mentioned in the assignment(although ethical issues are discussed in class) this seems very genuine

  • most of the students realize the potential  tradeoff between being financially successful and having “quality of life”  and are already struggling with this


Appendix 1

Personal Evaluation and Mission Assignment

This assignment is designed to help you  perform a strategic analysis of a  very important organization:   You, Inc.  For the rest of your life you will be CEO of You, Inc.  Thus, it is important that   you have a mission statement, strategic analysis, and business plan  for  this organization.   If you choose to  do this assignment, rather than the strategy questions  distributed in class, you should perform steps 1,2, and 3 below.   The remaining steps go beyond the scope of this assignment, but would be necessary if you were  to do a more complete analysis including an analysis of your chosen career in financial analysis, financial services, sales, etc.

1.      Self-Analysis (Strengths/Weaknesses)
Aspirations
Education/Special Training/Certification
Experience
Knowledge/Skills
Values
Personality Traits
Spiritual Needs
Family Needs
Mobility
Job/Position/Company Characteristics Preferences
Limitations


2.        Develop a Personal Mission Statement.    The best ones include aspects of your personal, professional, and spiritual life.

3.      Develop a simple “business plan” for the next five years, but include personal and spiritual goals(as appropriate) along with professional goals.  Some of the items on the next page  may be helpful in developing your plan, so they are included although they are not a part of this assignment.



Thanks to Dr. Gregory Konz,  S.J. ,  Marquette University, for  Parts 1 and 4-7 and for providing the inspiration for this assignment.




Personal Evaluation and Mission Assignment—page 2


These steps are recommended by  Fr. Konz,  who developed the assignment as a Personal Analysis and Strategic Career Analysis.  I am not asking you to do this—just giving it to you as an interesting way to follow up the analysis for my class and convert it into a career analysis if you want to.   Since I think many of you have already done some of this, I think it is more appropriate for juniors or sophomores than for you.

4.      Environmental Analysis (Opportunities/Threats)
·         Occupational Analysis
1.      Occupational Options/Outlooks
2.      Level of Geographic concentration of Jobs
3.      Educational/Knowledge/Skills/Experience Requirements
4.      Key Desired Personality Traits
5.      Time/Travel Demands
6.      Total Compensation (Starting, Average and Ultimate)

·         Industry Analysis (Identify the one of interest)
1.      Define Industry SIC code
2.      Markets
3.      Size: Number of companies and Sales over past five years
4.      Major Firms
5.      Channels of Distribution
6.      Degree of Vertical Integration
7.      Analysis of Competitive Forces (strong, moderate, weak)
8.      Critical Success Factors
9.      Environmental Influences
10.  Future Prospects (growth, decline, stagnation, et cetera)

·         Company Analysis (Select one or two of interest)
1.      Reason for Selection
2.      Brief Description of Ethical Standards/History/Culture
3.      Human Resource Policies/Practices/Upward Mobility
4.      Relative Compensation
5.      SWOT Analysis
6.      Long Term Strategies
7.      Future Prospects


Personal Evaluation and Mission Assignment—page 3

5.      Career Strategy Analysis/Choice
·         Identify Your Long-Term Objectives
·         Career Options Available
1.      Identify the strategic options that are opportunities of which you wish to take advantage (occupation, industry, specific business or firm, job, et cetera)
2.      Identify the options that will allow you to avoid environmental threats
3.      Provide the pros/cons of each strategic option in terms of the information identified in your Self-Analysis and Environmental Analysis
·         Career Strategy Choice (explain rationale for choice thoroughly)

6.      Implementation
·         Identify and prioritize self-improvement, skill development and other tasks/activities
·         Categorize the above in terms of time frame (short,  intermediate,  or long-term)
·         Identify all means that you plan to use to build on your strengths and to reduce your weaknesses

7.      Evaluation/Control
·         Explain how you plan to monitor your progress toward your long-term objectives
·         Indicate any contingency plans


For Premium Academic and Professional Research: jumachris85@gmail.com

For more theory and case studies on: http://expertresearchers.blogspot.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment