Warc, 19 June 2014
BOSTON: High-value ad formats are taking an increasing share
of the mobile advertising market, as their greater effectiveness reduces
interest in static banner ads, research has shown.
According to Nexage, the mobile advertising exchange,
interstitial, rich media, and video ad formats currently account for 35% of its
total inventory but are set to take at least half by next year.
In evidence it cited the growth rates it was seeing for
these formats: requests for video ads were up 516% over the year, while for
rich media there had been a 346% rise and for interstitials 194%.
In parallel with the growing number of requests, the number
of video ads delivered was up 404%, rich media up 216% and interstitials up
178%.
"There is a major creative mix shift underway in mobile
advertising, as high-value rich media, video, and native ad formats take more
and more share of the market," Victor Milligan, Nexage CMO, told Warc,
adding that this development had a "direct and significant impact on the
value publishers can gain from mobile, the ability of advertisers to showcase
their brands to an increasingly mobile consumer."
This was leading to a "powerful virtuous cycle where
investments by publishers are met with investments by media buyers and so
on". Accordingly, he expected that growth rates for supply and demand
would "accelerate such that rich media, video, and native will be the
majority ad formats sold by next year."
Nexage also cited research from Celtra, a specialist in cross-screen
HTML5 technology for advertising, which looked at the performance of different
mobile display ad formats across campaigns served in Q1 2014.
It found that rich media, or expandable banners,
outperformed static banners by a factor of 26 on engagement rates. For
interstitials, the figure was a more modest, but still impressive, eight times
greater engagement.
This pattern was repeated on other metrics, with
click-through rates nine times higher for rich media and eight times for
interstitials, and video play rates 8.5 times higher for rich media and twice
as high for interstitials.
Data sourced from Nexage; additional content by Warc staff
No comments:
Post a Comment