Warc, 2 July 2014
NEW YORK: A mixture of "malfeasance and faulty
measurement" is restricting the effectiveness of online advertising,
according to a new study published in the Journal of Advertising Research.
Benjamin Edelman, an associate professor at Harvard Business
School, outlined several digital challenges that brands must seek to overcome
in a paper entitled: Pitfalls and Fraud in Online Advertising Metrics – What
Makes Advertisers Vulnerable to Cheaters and How They Can Protect Themselves.
One early form of "cheating" was known as
"banner farming", where websites would open separate sub-windows
which were invisible to users and hosted ads that were never seen.
"When fraudsters manipulate advertising systems, their
efforts often may appear highly effective but, in fact, invite advertisers to
invest in placements that are ineffective," Edelman said.
Detecting this behaviour was complicated by the low average
clickthrough rates recorded by display ads as a whole – typically coming in at
around 0.1%.
Pay-per-click techniques appear to be a step forward in this
area, but some third-party services hired by advertising networks to syndicate
ads then use tools like botnets and adware to falsify clicks.
Relying on conversion rates – namely, the number of actual
purchases made – might be one way to reward effective sites. It threatens,
however, to undermine platforms where influence is real, but not immediate.
"Cheaters" could also "game" such
approaches by identifying buyers predisposed to making purchases from a certain
site or vendor, and then claiming to have referred them.
In terms of measurement, a current weakness involves the
difficulty of discounting those users clicking on ads solely for convenience,
as they would have chosen a particular site anyway in organic search listings.
"The better known an advertiser, the greater the chance
that buyers would buy at its site even without advertising," Edelman
suggested.
"Moreover, technological advances cause these problems
to grow beyond search advertising to affect other advertising formats
also."
And the incentives for discovery, he continued, are
"mixed" for some key players within the digital ecosystem.
"Advertising brokers and networks have mixed
incentives," Edelman wrote. "They sometimes genuinely seek to improve
advertisers' efforts, but often their interests are at odds with what's best
for advertisers."
Furthermore, he insisted, "Standard methods of
accountability and dispute resolution have proven ineffective; advertisers have
struggled to hold perpetrators and intermediaries accountable for apparent
breaches."
Data sourced from Journal of Advertising Research
No comments:
Post a Comment