Whenever
a business is faced with poor performance and imminent closure, the business
executives need to be fully equipped with the right information. This
information is necessary to make an informed analysis of the situation in order
to facilitate informed decision making on whether a firm facing difficulties
should consider pursuing alternative means of survival or simply close shop and
withdraw from the markets in question (Hitt, Duane and Robert, 2001). Proper
understanding in the stage in which an organisation is in the industry life
cycle is crucial in determining the options available for the organisation. The
evaluation can effectively be done through analysis models including: the SWOT analysis, the Porter’s 5-Forces, and
the PESTEL models which facilitate accurate internal and external analysis of
organisations (Sheldrake, 2003).
The
SWOT analysis helps outlines the firm’s capabilities by examining their
strengths and weaknesses where strengths refer to the firm’s capabilities that
could be exploited to provide the firm with a competitive advantage (Johnson,
Scholes, and Whittington, 2005). Most organisations would ordinarily have a
sizeable range of strengths that could provide a lease of life for them if put
into good use. Weaknesses refer to the firm’s internal factors that put them at
a disadvantage in the market. It is also important to analyse the external
environment in order to determine opportunities and threats that the firm may
be exposed to. SWOT analysis enables organisations to evaluate the possibility
of matching their strengths to the opportunities available as well as try to
convert their weaknesses and threats into strengths and opportunities. It also
enables organisations to make a rational decision on how to counter arising
threats in the environment (Johnson, Scholes, and Whittington, 2005).
The
Porter’s 5-Forces analysis provides the required framework. This model estimates
the level of rivalry in the industry by considering factors such as the threat
of substitution, threat of entry of new industry players, the bargaining power
of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers and the level of rivalry posed by
the competitors (Pearce and Robinson, 2005). Each of the factors is evaluated
to determine the level of rivalry with higher levels being an indicator that
organisations in the industry have lower prospects of survival or growth. This
industry analysis helps shape the choice of generic strategies that an
organisation can settle on to enhance its survival.
Business
enterprises do not operate in isolation and are often subject to changes in the
macro-environment. These changes can be traced through the use of the PESTEL
model. This model provides a balanced approach to the analysis enabling the
executives to focus on the most important aspects of the external environment. Focus
on Political, Economic, Socio-cultural, Technological, Environmental, and Legal
factors enable a balanced perspective that could provide the needed insight to
guide the strategy for the organisation.
Once
the information needed to inform strategy has been gathered, the business
executives are bound to make a decision on whether or not to stay in their
current markets. Depending on the results of the analysis, the executives could
resort to one or more of the following approaches to turn around their
businesses: rebranding campaigns, redesigning and re-launching the failing
products, cost cutting measures, restructuring, and the demand creation among
non-consumers.
Cost
cutting measures tend to be appropriate in industries where the level of
rivalry is considerably high (Pearce and Robinson, 2005). This limits the
ability of organisations to increase their pricing making it imperative to turn
inwards to ensure profitability. The most commonly applied approach to cost
cutting often touches on the reduction of the labour force where redundant
workers are laid off with the remaining workers facilitated to increase
productivity. Cost reduction may also relate to the cutting down on
non-essential expenditures and concentrating the expenditure on only the areas
that are considered central to achieving the firm’s objectives (Pearce and
Robinson, 2005). Business processes can also result in unnecessary expenditure
hence limiting the profit potential of such businesses. Businesses can opt to
pursue a process restructuring program that ensures that the wastes associated
with production are minimised. The option of recycling used product parts tend
to be a cheaper option than the constant use of new materials. Cost cutting can
also be done by pursuing alternative sources of raw materials. In the
increasingly globalised world, raw materials can be sourced internationally
where the savings tend to be higher than the cost of transporting the materials
(Hitt, Duane and Robert, 2001).
Rebranding
campaigns are often conducted to change the perception of the consumers in a
bid to get them to consume the firm’s products (Pearce and Robinson, 2005).
This method is commonly used where the brand image of a firm has been
significantly eroded. Rebranding is often accompanied with re-packaging and
re-launch of products, preferably after incorporating the features that address
the changing needs of the consumers (Pearce and Robinson, 2005). For instance,
Colgate could add a much desired component to their toothpastes and re-launch
the product in the market. This can be done together with a well designed
branding exercise that may be aimed at ensuring any undesirable brand image is
shed off. Failure to rebrand upon the re-launch of products may prove to be
ineffective since consumers may continue to relate the new products to the
brand image they are used to.
When
faced with poor prospects in the industry, a firm may opt to embark on demand
creation among non-traditional clients. This strategy is known as the blue
ocean strategy where a firm avoids the existing industry rivalry to chart unbeaten
paths in segments that would enable them to increase their performance
potential (Johnson, Scholes, and Whittington, 2005). For instance, Colgate
Palmolive mainly serves the traditional consumer at the households. A blue
ocean strategy could see the company try to create demand among non-traditional
customers such as corporate organisations, hospitals and schools using well
orchestrated marketing campaigns that focus on highlighting on the product
features that best serve these segments.
For more theory and case studies on: http://expertresearchers.blogspot.com/
Hitt,
M. A., Duane, R. ., Robert, E.H., 2001. Strategic Management:
Competitiveness and Globalization. 4th Ed. Cincinnati, Ohio:
South-Western College Publishing
Johnson,
G., Scholes, K., Whittington, R., 2005. Exploring
Corporate Strategy. 7th Ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall
Pearce,
J., Robinson, R., 2005. Strategic
Management. 9th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill
Sheldrake,
J., 2003. Management Theory, Second Edition. United Kingdom: Thomson Learning Institute
No comments:
Post a Comment