Warc, 2 September 2014
WESTPORT, CT: There is no such thing as a low-involvement
category, according to a leading Kimberly-Clark executive, just low-involvement
ideas and low-involvement thinking.
"We don't ever use the term 'low involvement' because
that immediately leads to a lower bar in terms of expectations," said
Clive Sirkin, CMO of the paper products business, in an interview with The Hub.
He has adopted a similarly robust approach to digital
marketing – he has banned the concept, preferring to think about
"behaviour and networks and expectations" rather than technology.
"I'm not really sure about the difference between
off-line and online," he said. "I just know that there's one consumer
and she doesn't make an announcement that she's moving out of her analog world
into a digital world."
In his view, the very idea of different types of marketing
is an anathema. It should all be about building brands, he argued. "The
minute you start fracturing marketing and creating groups doing different
things, you're going to create a fractured experience for the brand."
Too many brands, he suggested, were focused on simply
communicating a promise when the real issue was how to deliver on that promise,
repeatedly, or risk losing credibility and trust.
"We spend a lot of time bringing together and
integrating people with different skill sets and talents, as opposed to sending
off specialized groups with a piece of the puzzle," he explained. "We
bring them together and make that part of the culture, the behaviour and the
reward."
The ultimate aim, he said, was to "create a brand
experience that's consistent, meaningful, respectful and responsive".
In the past Sirkin has spoken of the "insanity"
that characterises the marketing discipline, which, he argued, tends to be
dominated by talk of change and revolution but remains resolutely stuck in
legacy mode.
His response has been to give his marketers "the
freedom and the licence" to take intelligent risks.
Data sourced from The Hub; additional content by Warc staff
No comments:
Post a Comment